In the beginning it seemed like a cool idea, you could rent out a room in your house for some extra cash here and there. Then it turned into a full on residential hotel business operated by corporations. We are experiencing a flood of vacation rentals such as Airbnb and Vrbo with over a thousand vacation rental properties in the city alone. These rentals are required to register with the city but not many do. Its important we keep them accountable to ensure our residents are not overly burdened. These registration fees help with, added trash/ brush service,inspectors, police and fire personnel. On the othe hand Airbnb homes cause increased home values and vacation rentals can not be homesteaded meaning they pay higher taxes which help keep residents taxes lower.
When it comes to electric bikes and scooters our hands are tied by the state, same as air bnb laws. An electric bike is required to be treated as a regular bike and cant be outlawed. I met with the principal of Roosevelt elementary and the police chief to put together a training day for kids on proper sidewalk etiquette . There is no question electric bikes need to slow down for pedestrians and they startle people that aren't expecting them. When I consulted with the chief of police, I had received some data from FDOT that could aid in finding the solution. I also proposed signs on sidewalks in problem areas and near the schools that say "Pedestrians have the right of way, wheeled vehicles must slow down for foot traffic".
Electric scooters and bicycles can be very good for the community if used responsibly. Many tourist rent them instead of uber or lift. Many kids use them to go to school. Many older people that don't have the energy to ride a bike now can, and many residents use them to get around town... Myself included. They are economical, they are easy to use, they cut down on our carbon footprint and my favorite, they cut down on traffic. Let's figure out a way to get the offenders to adhere to basic safety rules rather then have a few bad apples ruin the whole bunch. Electric is the future, we can't just outlaw technology because we are to lazy to figure out a solution.
I have lived here my entire life, I like my small home town feel. It is my wish that Cocoa Beach could stay the same small town I grew up in, but growth is also important for our economy. It is important to manage our growth by investigating every variance on a case by case basis to make sure it meets a hardship as well as enhances the community. An example, of a request would be if someone had a residential property they could legally build 45 foot tall, 20 units(2 acres) with no variance. This property owner needed to build out most of the property to the property set backs to fit their 20 units and a concrete parking lot that would take up the rest of the property. It would be in an area where all the other buildings are 85-90 feet tall. Keep in mind as a height reference, the picture above is Xanadu condos 183 feet tall and is beside a building just under 70 feet tall. In my opinion if a variance was requested (70 feet or less), it met a hardship and they wanted to add under building parking for hurricane wash through protection as well as having more green space, I'd be ok with that. If they could only have 8 foot ceilings and wanted to have 10 foot ceilings for a more modern look, I'm ok with that. If they needed A facade on the roof to cover the air conditioning and other roof top utilities, I'm OK with that. So if a building was being built with NO extra density but wanted more green space and a more modern feel I think it is better then building out the whole property with concrete. That property in its current state would be taxed at $700,000, improved could be $20,000,000. This would bring in more tax revenue for the city to keep taxes lower.
Cocoa Beach has a generally unkeept feel to it, and honestly it has always been like that. There are places like this all over the city and it gives visitors and residents an overall poor perspective of the city. The problem is this is all people see. They don't see how much work goes on behind the scenes. So it is almost more important to take care of what is seen, then what goes on internally. It will build more confidence with the residents if the government can take care of the little stuff because it shows they must have the big stuff under control. We should have a person walking through on a regular basis to keep maintenance accountable. We don't need more money to take care of this problem, we just need more attention to detail when our vendors or employees do their jobs.
We voted last year to do a feasibility study to see if a marina would be environmentally and monetarily feasible. The survey is not yet complete so we still do not have the data to move forward. After hearing much concern from the residents, Keith Has voted to not fund the second half of the marina study due to lack of information. Keith will absolutely not move forward with a marina that is not overwhelmingly feasible. One of the ways we currently get revenue is through our parking.. the thought was A city marina could yield as much as $150 per day per slip. This project has the potential to make the city hundreds of thousands a year in revenue without negatively impacting the residents. We are currently doing a feasibility study to put a city marina at the east end of the golf course and it would also help subsidise the losses accrued by the County Club each year. It's a great revenue producer for the city and It brings in a quality crowd with money. You won't find a marina in the area with open slips because they are all full. It won't negatively impact the residents with trashy tourists or loud music. It would be away from residential properties, It won't create a noticeable difference with city traffic because most will be traveling by boat. It's close to the river so boats won't have to travel through residential canals to get to it. And it will enhance the view and perception of the city. We are a city surrounded by water yet we do nothing to promote our biggest asset. The best part of all is this could be funded with grants and a revenue bond so that the marina pays for itself and none of the residents money will need to be used to fund this project.
The lagoon is looking the best it has looked in years. The muck dredging seems to have helped tremendously. I was against the 1/2% sales tax in the beginning but I have seen a tremendous renawal of our lagoon in the past 2 years. I would however like to focus on clam restoration rather then oyster beds. Ask any old time clammer from Cape Canaveral and they will tell you "oysters don't grow well here". They can teach you more about this area then the experimental data ever will. In an ideal environment, oysters will take over and grow on docks, seawalls and create underwater bars... Why is this idea bad? 1. Oysters don't grow well here because of lack of flow, poor water quality and heat. 2. Oysters are very sharp, which would be dangerous for kids and people enjoying the shore lines and sandbars. 3. Oyster bars can ruin props and hulls of boats. 4. Oysters do not allow sea grass to grow when they spread. Why would the city spend money on an oyster experiment when we know clams can thrive here? I think a more productive use of the grant money would be to plant clam seed in the river. 1 They cover more ground. 2 They don't create bars. 3 They can grow in any depth. 4. They don't need as much flow. 5 They used to grow naturally in our river. 6 They won't ruin boats. 7 They won't hurt people. The only difference in filtration is An oyster can filter 50 gallons a day while a clam filters 24 gallons a day. If filtration is the main point, lets use the money for what is tried and true instead of an experiment.
Comming soon!
Copyright © 2024 VoteKeith.com - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.